| |
|
|
PEARL
Heritage Group Cities
Knowledge
Manager - CEPT (Ahmedabad)
City
Convener -
Agra
Cities
-
Madurai, Varanasi, Agra, Amritsar, Allahabad, Panaji, Bodhgaya,
Ujjain, Puri, Ajmer-Pushkar, Mysore, Pondicherry, Mathura, Haridwar, Nanded
....More
|
|
Heritage
Cells in Urban Local Bodies
|
|
Heritage
Regulation in Ahmedabad Urban Area
|
|
Heritage
Events under PEARL
|
|
Heritage Resource Persons:
Contact Details
|
|
List
of Indian Heritage sites - UNESCO
|
|
|
|
World
Heritage sites - UNESCO
|
|
|
|
Heritage,
Culture and Religious Cities (Group D) constituting of 15 JNNURM
Cities under PEARL is the network for heritage cities. Two more
cities - Tirupati and Porbandar has been added to this group
recently. The main objective of this page is to share and discuss
various initiatives being taken in the area of heritage conservation
under the identified Cities and in non-JNNURM Cities as well. Key
achievements, issues and updates at the Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)
level that include linkage between urban planning and heritage
development; comprehensive guideline formulation and clear road map
for action to protect the heritage cities shall be discussed and
updated here regularly. You are also welcome to send us more
information, updates, news/events, etc. regarding this important
area of concern.
|
|
*
|
|
|
Most
of the Indian cities have a strong architectural and urban character
in their core inner city areas. These inner city areas where once
life, culture and business flourished have been neglected as the
cities have grown over time. This has resulted in gradual decay of
these areas. Experiences from all over the world have shown that
preservation of heritage areas with modern development can serve the
purpose of business and sustainability. However, it is often found
that historic urban monuments are getting decayed in India due to:
-
Lack
of proper policy
-
Lack
of appropriate legal framework
-
Lack of awareness
and appreciation towards heritage properties and
-
Lack
of financial and technical resources
Many
Indian monuments are lying uncared. In the backdrop of this,
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation in collaboration with CRUTA
foundation, an N.G.O. has established the first Heritage Cell within
an Urban Local Body (ULB) in India in 1996. Apart from Ahmedabad,
Rajasthan Government, Delhi-Development Authority (DDA), Mumbai
Municipal Corporation (MMC), Delhi Municipal Corporation (MCD),
Cochin Municipal Corporation (CMC), Pondicherry Municipality have
made efforts towards heritage conservation. The schemes can be
divided in four categories, which are as follows:
Category
1. Rajasthan Government's Public-Private peoples' participation
scheme for conservation and development of cities having Heritage
and Tourism importance: A scheme having public-private peoples'
participation was launched by the Government of Rajasthan for
conservation and development of 23 cities /towns having Heritage and
Tourist importance in the year 2004. The cities are 1) Ajmer, 2)
Alwar, 3) Bharatpur, 4) Bikaner, 5) Banswara, 6) Bundi, 7) Chahabra,
8) Chittorgarh, 9) Deeg, 10) Dungarpur, 11) Jaisalmer, 12) Jodhpur,
13) Jhalwar, 14) Kota, 15) Pushkar, 16) Sawai Madhopur, 17) Udaipur,
18) Sikar, 19) Chomu, 20) Mandwa, 21) Nawalgarh, 22) Jhunjhunu, 23)
Fatehpur. It was decided to establish a Heritage Cell in the
municipalities of the selected cities/ towns under the Chairmanship
of the District Collector. The main idea was to identify and
preserve the cities' natural and built heritage. It was also
intended to educate the public about the heritage and involve them
in preserving the heritage. The intention was also to promote
tourism in the heritage cities and encourage the local
craftsmen/women to sell their products directly to the tourists.
Thus the local bodies of 23 selected cities were asked to keep a
budget head for heritage component in the 2004-05 budget. One
engineer from the local body and one town planner from the Town
Planning Department were to be deputed to look after the work of the
Heritage Cell. The listing is to be done with the help of INTACH.
District level meetings involving various departments like
Department of Archeology, Town Planning, Tourism, Local Bodies will
be held under the chairmanship of District Collector for proper
development, better coordination and less duplication of work in the
Heritage Sector. Conservation regulation will be framed and
provision in the model law will be formulated. Help from the NGOs
working in the Heritage sector will be sought. The Local Government
Department will be the nodal agency for the Conservation
projects.
Category
2. Delhi-Development Authority (DDA) / Mumbai Municipal Corporation
(MMC) Model: The DDA and NMC look after the Heritage Cell formed
in these local bodies. The aims and objectives are the same as those
of others.
Category
3. - Delhi Municipal Corporation (MCD) / Cochin Municipal
Corporation (CMC) These Municipal Corporations have created
Heritage Cells within these Urban Local Bodies and have registered
them as societies for better functional autonomy and
efficiency.
Category
4. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) / Pondicherry Municipality
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) has set up its Heritage
Cell in 1996 in collaboration with a NGO called CRUTA (Foundation
for Conservation and Research of Urban Traditional Architecture).
This is the first initiative in setting up a Heritage Cell in India.
Later on, Pondicherry municipality has also set up a Heritage Cell
along the same line with the help of INTACH (Indian National Trust
for Arts and Cultural Heritage)
|
|
|
|
* This
note is based on the paper Role of Heritage Cells
in Urban Local Bodies for Revival of Heritage Cells in India
presented by Shri Debashish Nayak in National Workshop on Cultural,
Heritage and Religious Cities, Peer Experience and Reflective
Learning (PEARL), JNNURM on 2. 2. 2009 at Madurai. The above note is
summarised by
Dr. Basudha
Chattopadhyay, NIUA
|
|
|
|
Indian
Heritage Cities Network, UNESCO
The
Indian Heritage Cities Network was founded in September 2006 at
an international conference held in Jaipur. Established with the
endorsement of the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of
India, the Network now comprises twenty Indian member cities,
seven French city and regional partners, several universities
and institutional members and a number of NGO partners, with
many more Indian and European cities, regions and universities,
expressing interest in joining us. The Network provides a
platform for sharing experience and expertise for the
sustainable socio-economic and cultural development of India's
historic cities. You are welcomed to join this network and
contact the secretariat for further information:
Indian
Heritage Cities Network Secretariat UNESCO
B
5/ 29 Safdarjung Enclave
New
Delhi 110029
Phone
: 011 26713000
Email
: info@ihcn.in
Website
: www.heritagecitiesindia.in |
Center
For Environmental Planning and Technology's (CEPTs) role as
Knowledge Manager for Group D Cities
CEPT,
a premier institute in India, was identified as the knowledge
manager for Group D Cultural, Heritage and Religious cities. The
functions and responsibilities of CEPT as a Knowledge Manager
would include various activities from data assimilation,
compilation to sharing with the network cities, in an attempt to
promote cross learning.
-
Knowledge
Creation through Consultation - in the form of city level
meetings, workshops, trainings and presentation
-
Process
management - links into the identification and deployment of
practices associated with various Processes, identification
of information needs
-
Creation
of Knowledge Library - Research Studies, Information
Management and sharing, Information/ Education and
Communication
-
Development
of Guidelines/Toolkits
-
Creation,
Up gradation and Maintenance of Virtual Help Desk - through
web Portal
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
the public interest, the Government of Gujarat felt the necessity to
make variations in the General Development Control Regulations (G.D.C.R.)
of revised Development Plan of Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
sanctioned in May 2002. The variations proposed, which was related
to Heritage Regulations came into force in September 2007. This
regulation applies to those buildings, artifacts, structures, areas
and precincts having aesthetic and/or architectural and /or cultural
and /or environmental significance and natural areas of scenic
beauty including but not limited to sacred groves, hills, hillocks,
water bodies (and the areas adjoining the same), open areas, wooded
areas ('natural features') which will be listed by the
Government.
Restriction
on development / redevelopment/ repairs etc.: It imposes
restriction on development, redevelopment, repairs etc. No
development, additions, alterations, repairs, renovations etc. will
be allowed of the listed heritage buildings without the prior
written permission of the competent authority. The Competent
Authority will consult Heritage Conservation Committee before
granting any such permission. The heritage Conservation Committee
will consider suggestions and objections of the public before
granting any permission for demolition or major alterations of the
listed heritage buildings. The owners of the heritage buildings will
be responsible for carrying out any repairs and maintenance at its
own cost.
Preparation
of list of heritage buildings, heritage precincts and listed natural
features: The list of heritage sites will not be part of the
Regulation for the purpose of Section 19 of the Gujarat Town
Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976. The list will be modified
from time to time by Government and / or the Competent Authority on
the advice of the Heritage Conservation Committee.
Grading
of the listed heritage buildings/ listed heritage precincts: The
Heritage buildings, precincts should be graded as I, II, III. The
definitions are as follows: "Heritage Grade I comprises
buildings and precincts of national or historical importance,
embodying excellence in architectural style, design, technology and
material usage and/or aesthetics; they may be associated with a
great historic event, personality, movement or institution. They
have been and are the prime landmarks of the region. All natural
sites shall fall within Grade I." "Heritage II (A&B)
comprises buildings and precincts of regional or local importance
possessing special architectural or aesthetic merit or cultural or
historical significance though of a lower scale than in Heritage
Grade I. They are local landmarks, which contribute to the image and
identity of the region. They may be the work of master craftsmen or
may be models of proportion and ornamentation, or designed to suit a
particular climate." "Heritage Grade III comprises
buildings and precincts of importance for townscape; they evoke
architectural, aesthetic, or sociological interest though not as
much as in Heritage Grade II. These contribute to determining the
character of the locality and can be representative of the lifestyle
of a particular community or region and may also be distinguished by
setting on a street line, or special character, of the façade and
uniformity of height, width and scale."
Power
to alter, modify or relax other General Development Control
Regulations: On the advice of the Heritage Conservation
Committee and for reasons recorded in writing the Competent
Authority may/shall alter, modify, relax the provisions of General
Development Control Regulations of the Draft Development Plan for
AUDA.
Special
regulations for listed heritage precincts: In cases of heritage
precincts and of natural features, development permissions shall be
granted in accordance with the special regulations prescribed for
respective precincts, natural features, which shall be framed by the
Competent Authority on the advice of the Heritage Conservation
Committee.
Applicability
of development proposals to listed heritage buildings/ listed
heritage precincts: The development proposals (of the town)
should be such as to protect and not to detract from the listed
heritage precincts/ natural features.
Incentive
uses for listed heritage buildings: If the owner agrees to
maintain the listed heritage building as it is in the existing state
and to preserve its heritage state with due repairs and gives
written undertaking to that effect, the owner may be allowed by the
Competent Authority on the advice of the Heritage Conservation
Committee to convert part or the whole of the non-commercial area
within such a heritage building to commercial office use/ hotel use.
If the heritage building is not maintained suitably, the commercial
use would be disallowed.
Creation
of new incentives for heritage conservation: Incentives may be
created for heritage conservation of listed heritage buildings /
listed heritage precincts by the Competent Authority on the advice
of the Heritage Conservation Committee. These incentives may include
Transfer of Development Rights, the creation of a Repair Fund, Tax
incentive etc.
Maintaining
skyline and architectural harmony: Buildings within listed
heritage precincts and in the vicinity of listed Grade I heritage
buildings/ listed natural features shall maintain the skyline and
follow those architectural styles so as not to diminish or destroy
the value and beauty of or the view from the said listed heritage
precinct/ listed heritage building or of the listed natural
features.
Composition
of heritage conservation committee: The Government shall
constitute a Heritage Conservation Committee and frame the terms of
reference. The said Committee will be composed of chairperson, 11
members and a member secretary. The composition and qualifications
are specified.
|
|
Heritage walk of
Ahmedabad City |
|

Non-polluting
Public transport at Pondicherry |
|

Madurai:
Proposed City Structure Plan |
 |
| Jallianwala
Bagh, Amritsar: Proposed Streetscape |
|
|
|